Women on 20s: Is there global precedent for women on money?

British bank notesWomenOn20s, a nonprofit advocacy group, is gathering online votes to petition Obama to put a famous woman on the $20 bill, replacing Andrew Jackson. Obama has the authority to issue an order to the U.S. Treasury, directing it to put a new face on the $20. Should he?

This week, we’ve covered the growing movement to replace Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill with a famous American woman: how to vote online at www.womenon20s.org, why the $20 bill in the first place, what a national poll says about Americans’ preferences, and adding the late Cherokee Principal Chief Wilma Mankiller to the list.

Today, we consider what Americans’ opinions are in general—and who else around the world puts women on money.

Should Obama order a new face for the $20? About two of ten Americans (22%) don’t have an opinion or are unsure, according to a new poll by Rasmussen Reports. Just under half (45%) agree with the proposal to replace Jackson with a famous American woman. And, about a third (34%) say Old Hickory should stay on the $20.

Not to be left out of anything about money, MONEY Magazine, a publication of Time, Inc., is promoting its own online poll. You can choose from a list that includes Eleanor Roosevelt, Abigail Adams, Sally Ride, Harriet Tubman, Amelia Earhart, Ayn Rand, and Beyoncé. (So far, Rand is the runaway favorite in this poll.)

MONEY also notes that at least 10 countries already have women on paper currency, setting a global precedent. These include Argentina, Australia, England, Israel, Mexico, New Zealand, Philippines, Sweden, Syria, and Turkey.

And, women get dumped from currency. In 1995, Israel starting withdrawing the 10 shekel notes bearing the likeness of Golda Meir, the late Prime Minister of Israel. The Bank of Israel replaced the paper bill with a new coin. Golda Meir also appeared on the 10,000 shekel banknote, but no more.

Should Obama order the likeness of a famous woman to be printed on the $20?
If yes, whose likeness should it be?

Eleanor Roosevelt 20 dollar bill

Share this series with friends …

OurValues is designed to spark spirited, civil discussion. You’re free to print out these columns and use them in a class or small group. Or, simply talk about this on Facebook or Twitter.

Comments: (0)
Categories: Uncategorized

Women on 20s: Should Wilma Mankiller replace Jackson on the $20?

Wilma_Mankiller_-_YouTube

WATCH THE VIDEO about her life, below.

The list of 15 famous women who could replace Jackson on the $20 was compiled by experts, but there is always controversy about who is and who isn’t on any list. One prominent woman left off the list is Wilma Mankiller, late Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation. Given Jackson’s role in the forced relocation and death of Native Americans, some say it would be poetic justice to have Mankiller replace him on the $20 bill. She actually has a real chance of doing so.

Would you support it?

Wilma Mankiller’s father was Cherokee, her mother Caucasian. She rose to become the Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation in 1985, serving for a decade. Mankiller was an activist, best-selling author, and politician. Her awards included the Presidential Medal of Freedom (given by Bill Clinton) and Ms. Magazine Woman of the Year in 1987. (Read more about her life here—plus, you’ll enjoy the video below.)

Mankiller was inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame in 1993. According to her bio there, “Mankiller used her skills to help the Cherokee Nation, starting community self-help programs and teaching people ways out of poverty… [She] brought about important strides for the Cherokees, including improved health care, education, utilities management and tribal government. Future plans call for attracting higher-paying industry to the area, improving adult literacy, supporting women returning to school and more.

“Mankiller also lived in the larger world, active in civil rights matters, lobbying the federal government and supporting women’s activities and issues. She said: “We’ve had daunting problems in many critical areas, but I believe in the old Cherokee injunction to ‘be of a good mind. Today it’s called positive thinking’.”

Mankiller has a real chance of replacing Jackson. The top 3 vote getters in the primary round of voting on www.womenon20s.org will advance to the final round. At that time, Mankiller’s name will be added to the list, and voters will pick one of the final four to replace Jackson on the $20.

Should Mankiller replace Jackson?
Is there someone else you prefer who isn’t on the list?

Watch the story of Wilma Mankiller?

The following video looks at her remarkable life—plus, it includes the story of Andrew Jackson and the Trail of Tears.

Comments: (0)
Categories: Uncategorized

Women on 20s: Should Hillary Clinton replace Andrew Jackson?

Hillary Clinton 20 dollar billWomenOn20s, the organizers of the movement to replace Andrew Jackson with a famous woman, offers 15 candidates to choose from (see Monday’s post for the list). Today, I ask you to choose from a shorter list: Dolley Madison, Pocahontas, Harriet Tubman, Eleanor Roosevelt, Susan B. Anthony, or Hillary Clinton.

Who’s your top choice?

Why this short list? The reason is we know how Americans rank these candidates, based on a national survey this month by Rasmussen Reports. The surveyors chose five well-known women from American history, and added perhaps the best-known woman living today: Hillary Clinton. Hillary is included in the survey, but actually couldn’t be the official choice—living persons do not appear on the nation’s currency.

So, who’s the Number 1 choice of Americans nationwide?

It’s Eleanor Roosevelt—the longest-serving First Lady, human rights activist, politician, and diplomat. Among many activities, she chaired the United Nations Commission on Human Rights and the Presidential Commission on the Status of Women.

American’s second choice is Harriet Tubman, followed by Susan B. Anthony and Pocahontas.

How about Hillary Clinton—former Secretary of State, First Lady, and the presumptive Democratic candidate for president in 2016? Clinton comes in second to last. Only Dolley Madison garnered fewer votes.

Is Eleanor Roosevelt your top choice from this list of six candidates?
Is there someone else you’d rather see replace Jackson on the $20?

Share this series with friends …

OurValues is designed to spark spirited, civil discussion. You’re free to print out these columns and use them in a class or small group. Or, simply talk about this on Facebook or Twitter.

Comments: (0)
Categories: Uncategorized

Women on 20s: Why target Jackson? Why the $20?

Pocahontas 20 dollar bill

Some advocate replacing Jackson with Pocahontas.

The Women-On-20s movement to dump Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill and replace him with a famous woman is gaining traction. But why is Jackson the target? Why not George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, or any of the other men whose images adorn our paper currency?

The reason is political numerology.

The 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote, was ratified on August 18, 1920. This makes the year 2020 the 100th anniversary of the amendment. The year 2020 makes the $20 bill the perfect one to change.

So, the movement isn’t focused on getting rid of Old Hickory per se. WomenOn20s.org notes, however, that Jackson’s record might also be reason to remove him from the $20. As president, Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act that forcibly relocated Native Americans to western lands. Thousands of Cherokees died in what became known as the “Trail of Tears.” In his second annual address to Congress, he said, “It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation.”

Yet another reason was his opposition to paper currency. He strongly favored gold and silver coins. So, the spirit of Old Hickory might rest easier knowing that, finally, Jackson no longer appeared on the paper currency he hated.

Do you agree that the 100th anniversary of the 19th amendment makes the $20 bill the perfect choice to change?
Does Jackson’s record also warrant removal of his visage?

Your vote counts! Cast your vote here for up to three of 15 candidates Women on 20s proposes as replacements for Jackson on the $20.

Comments: (1)
Categories: Uncategorized

Women on 20s: Should a woman replace Jackson on the $20?

Blank 20 dollar bill“A woman’s place is on the money.”

This isn’t a quote from financial expert Suzie Orman. It’s from www.WomenOn20s.org, a growing social movement to boot Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill, replacing him with a woman who “embodies the values, ambitions and ethics upon which this country was founded.”

Do you support this movement? If yes, whose face would you like to see on the $20 bill? Women on 20s hopes to collect enough votes to compel President Obama to replace Old Hickory on the $20 bill.

Want to participate? Cast your vote here for up to three of the following 15 candidates. A range of experts was consulted to come up with this list. (The site also includes brief bios of each candidate.)

THE 15: Alice Paul, Sojourner Truth, Betty Friedan, Eleanor Roosevelt, Rachel Carson, Rosa Parks, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Clara Barton, Susan B. Anthony, Frances Perkins, Margaret Sanger, Harriett Tubman, Shirley Chisholm, Patsy Mink, Barbara Jordan

Famous women in America have not been entirely left out. The one exception for paper bills is Martha Washington, whose face appeared on the $1 silver certificate (1886, 1891) and the back of the $1 silver certificate (1896). And, we all know that Susan B. Anthony appeared on a $1 coin (which was often mistaken for a quarter dollar.)

For the record, here is a complete list of the images that appear on our nation’s paper currency. Most are presidents; all are men: George Washington ($1 ), Thomas Jefferson ($2) Abraham Lincoln ($5), Alexander Hamilton ($10), Andrew Jackson ($20), Ulysses S. Grant ($50), Benjamin Franklin ($100), William McKinley ($500), Grover Cleveland ($1,000), James Madison ($5,000), Salmon P. Chase ($10,000), Woodrow Wilson ($100,000).

Do you support or oppose replacing Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill?
Which of the 15 candidates is your top choice—and why?

KIDS WEIGH IN …

Click to view this video, which also is shared on the WomenOn20s website …

Share this series with friends …

OurValues is designed to spark spirited, civil discussion. You’re free to print out these columns and use them in a class or small group. Or, simply talk about this on Facebook or Twitter.

Comments: (0)
Categories: Uncategorized

Open Carry: Is Texas Next?

Former slaves in an Emmancipation Day celebration in Texas

WHY DID TEXAS BAN CARRYING HANDGUNS AFTER THE CIVIL WAR? According to the Huston Chronicle, Texas gun laws changed several times from the late 1860s through the 1880s. (Openly carrying “pistols” was made illegal midway through this period in 1871.) The Chronicle says that most of these legal changes were aimed at controlling freed slaves. (The photo, above, shows former slaves attending an annual Emancipation celebration in Texas.) Texas politics were violently confrontational after the Civil War and various factions boosted the legal restrictions on openly carrying handguns to limit the ability of opponents to play politics with loaded guns. By 1889, openly carrying a pistol became a crime punishable by imprisonment.

Most states permit handguns to be openly carried, but Texas is not one of them—at least a little while longer. The Lone Star state has banned the open carry of handguns for 140 years, but it looks like that is about to change, making Texas the largest state in the union that permits the practice.

Do you think it’s a good idea for Texans—and for the country?

This week, we’ve examine the controversy around openly carried weapons, triggered by the recent incidents in Ann Arbor and Detroit, MI, where gun-right activists openly carried weapons in or near schools. We discussed reasons in support of open carry and reasons against the practice. We also noted, based on recent surveys, that for the first time, a majority of Americans say it’s more important to protect the right to own guns than it is to control guns.

Early this week, the Texas Senate approved a bill that would allow Texans who have a permit for carrying concealed weapons to openly wear their handguns in public. Democrats in the Texas Senate generally opposed it, but Republicans are the majority and their votes carried the day. A final vote is still needed before it goes to the Texas House of Representatives.

If the bill makes it through both chambers, it lands on Gov. Greg Abbott’s desk. In a March 15th tweet, he indicated that he will sign it: “I’m warming up my signing pen: Texas Legislature Ready to Move Forward on Open Carry Bill.” (@GregAbbott_TX).

In other states with Republican majorities, efforts are underway to loosen restrictions on guns.

Do you approve or disapprove of the Texas bill to permit openly carried handguns?
If it passes, what implications will it have for the rest of the nation?
At the end of our week on open carry, where do you stand—for or against?

Care to read more?

If you are intrigued by our photo caption, above, you’ll want to read Lauren McGauhy’s full story in the Houston Chronicle.

Share this series with friends …

OurValues is designed to spark spirited, civil discussion. You’re free to print out these columns and use them in a class or small group. Or, simply talk about this on Facebook or Twitter.

Comments: (0)
Categories: Uncategorized

Open Carry: How important is it to protect the right to own guns?

Ann Arbor Public Schools News

Click the logo to read the new Ann Arbor statement.

How important is it to protect the individual right to own guns? Is it more or less important than controlling gun ownership?

One reason gun-rights activities promote open carry is protection of the right to own guns in the first place. A failure to exercise the right could result in loss of the right. A majority of the public might agree.

For the first time in 20 years, a majority of Americans (52%) say it’s more important to protect the right of Americans to own guns than it is to control the ownership of guns, according to a December 2014 poll by the Pew Research Center.

From 1993 to 2008, clear majorities of Americans said controlling gun ownership was more important than protecting the right to own guns. Since 2008, opinions were almost evenly split, but only at the end of 2014 did a majority say that protecting the right to bear arms is more important than controlling gun ownership.

Not surprisingly, Republicans strongly emphasize the need to protect the right of gun ownership, while Democrats emphasize controlling gun ownership. But the increase in support of gun rights occurs across the board for men and women, various age groups, educational groups, and so on.

Yesterday the Ann Arbor Public School Board of Education issued a statement declaring its intention to make schools “weapon free zones.” If the presence of weapons disrupts the educational environment, Michigan law permits school boards to restrict weapons on school grounds. The statement reads, in part:

“The Ann Arbor Public Schools has experienced disruptions for students, staff, and other participants when individuals open carry on district property, and as a result, AAPS will not allow weapons on district property, at events on campus or any school sponsored activities.”

Is it more important to protect gun rights than it is to control gun ownership?
Do you support or oppose the AAPS declaration of schools as weapons-free zones?

Share this series with friends …

OurValues is designed to spark spirited, civil discussion. You’re free to print out these columns and use them in a class or small group. Or, simply talk about this on Facebook or Twitter.

Comments: (0)
Categories: Uncategorized