Shavuot: Festival connecting harvest with the giving of the Torah

PLEASE ENJOY this sample chapter from Debra Darvick’s This Jewish Life, which tells about the season of Shavuot. Click the book cover image to learn more about her complete collection of stories.

All souls stood at Sinai, each accepting its share in the Torah.
Alshek. q Ragoler, Maalot HaTorah

This Jewish Life cover in 3D

CLICK this cover to learn more about Debra Darvick’s popular collection of real-life stories, THIS JEWISH LIFE: Stories of Discovery, Connection and Joy.

While there is no Biblical link between the Shavuot holiday and the giving of the Torah on Mount Sinai, the Talmud does draw a connection between the two. The rabbis calculated the dates of the agricultural festival of Shavuot and the time of the Revelation and deemed them to be one and the same. This link enabled the rabbis to bring new relevance to an agricultural holiday at a time when many Jews were living in urban areas.

Shavuot, literally “Festival of Weeks,” is so named because it occurs seven weeks and one day after the beginning of Passover. Shavout is also called Chag Habikurim, Festival of the First Fruits, and Chag HaKatzir, Harvest Festival. These names reflect the holiday’s origin as the time marking the end of the spring wheat harvest. The 50 days between the second day of Passover and Shavuot are called the counting of the omer, omer being a unit of measure. In Temple times, on the second day of Passover, the priests would offer up for sacrifice an omer of wheat, to mark the start of the seven-week wheat-growing season.

Tikkun Leil Shavuot

Many communities hold a Tikkun Leil Shavuot, an all-night study session that enables those present to prepare spiritually for the morning’s service, when the Ten Commandments are read. During the recitation of the Ten Commandments, the congregation stands, thus symbolically receiving them, as our ancestors did at Sinai.

Ruth’s Role

The Book of Ruth is included in the Shavuot morning service for several reasons. Ruth’s loyalty to her mother-in-law, Naomi, was such that she converted to Judaism. By consequence of that conversion and her subsequent marriage to Boaz (their court- ship is said to have taken place during Shavuot), Ruth became the ancestor of King David, who, according to the Talmud, was born and died on Shavuot.

Comments: (0)
Categories: BibleHolidaysJewishNatural World

The Love and Salt interview: Why letter writing still builds friendship and unlocks our spiritual vision

Click the cover to visit it's Amazon page.

Click the cover to visit this book’s Amazon page.

Christianity was founded on letters. St. Paul’s letters carried the faith into the world years before the four Gospels were published. Much later, America was founded on letters, which is why John Adams is associated with the current National Card and Letter-Writing Month. In the civil rights struggle, a letter from a Birmingham jail 50 years ago ignited a national movement for justice. (Read more about the 50th anniversary of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous letter in a second story, today.)

Recently, two American women—one who lives in Illinois and one in Virginia—published a collection of their letters, spanning three years and some tumultuous changes in their lives. Their project is a unique window into the spiritual lives of American women—wives, mothers and professionals in their 30s. While American women are the greatest consumers of spiritually themed media—books, magazines and websites—they usually find publishers offering them a heavy diet of older male voices. Instead, Amy Andrews and Jessica Mesman Griffith wrote their own inspirational Christian classic from scratch.

At ReadTheSpirit, we are not alone in praising Love & Salt. Gregory Wolfe, founder of Image magazine and a leading talent in American spiritual letters, described the book this way: “There are a lot of good books about the spiritual life out there, but one of their drawbacks is that they tend to organize experience into categories and abstractions and steps. … What if a book about God was something more like a conversation between two thoughtful people recording the messy vicissitudes of everyday life, including marriage and children, circling around important topics without schematizing them, sharing what they observe and read and care about? That’s precisely what we get in Love and Salt.

TODAY, rather than tell you more about Love and Salt, ReadTheSpirit Editor David Crumm talks with Amy and Jessica. Much as they do in their letters, they are able to share personal insights into what makes their three-year journey both unique—and universal.

HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR INTERVIEW ON ‘LOVE & SALT’
WITH AMY ANDREWS & JESSICA MESMAN GRIFFITH

DAVID: Fans of TV series and movies about women will be surprised to learn that your letters rarely mention shopping; your letters contain a lot about relationships, but not about sex; and your letters spend a lot of time focused on something that is rarely mentioned in Hollywood—your spiritual lives. What’s remarkable is that you two chose that theme and stuck to it for three years.

Amy Andrews, photo courtesy of the publisher.

Amy Andrews, photo courtesy of the publisher.

AMY: The basic premise was that we were going to write letters, telling each other stories about the state of our souls—stories about how we came to that place in our lives, each day.

JESSICA: We certainly didn’t set out to write a book! Honestly, I’m shocked by this book every time I re-read it. We were just two people who started this conversation through letters. The providential nature of what we tried to do is shown in how important our friendship would become. We were serious about writing letters as we started out, but we had no idea what our friendship ultimately would mean to us—or how much our growing faith would mean to us.

We were surprised that that, all of a sudden, what we were doing in writing and mailing these letters became a really important part of our lives. Eventually, these letters became something we had to do to survive. You can see in our early letters that we were wondering about our faith, pondering some theological ideas—then, as time passed, we began living out our faith. I’m still blown away by how this story unfolded. I lived through it. I wrote half the letters. But it’s as though the book wrote itself through all we experienced together.

DAVID: We won’t include spoilers to this interview, but I can say that your phrase—“all we experienced together”—includes intense heartbreak at one point in the overall story.

Before we talk further about what happened, I’m sure lots of readers are going to want to follow your example. So, let’s explain how you did this: You two met in a writing workshop and you both were interested in the Catholic Church. Jessica already was Catholic; Amy was going through the process to officially become a Catholic. Jessica, you agreed to be Amy’s sponsor as she formally joined the church. As part of your dual journeys both into writing and into the church, you decided to write these letters back and forth starting in Lent 2005.

What were the first steps? Did you go out and purchase stationery? Were you interested in fountain pens? Old-fashioned typewriters?

LOVE AND SALT:
‘THE CONVERSATION WAS THE PRIMARY THING’

AMY: We never used email. These letters were either typed or handwritten and the majority of them were handwritten.

DAVID: Typed? I’ve been a journalist long enough that I actually started out using a typewriter like the drawing on the cover of your book.

AMY: No. We typed them on the computer, then printed them out before mailing them. But, we didn’t even want these letters to stay resident on our computers. Often, I got rid of the computer copies after they were printed. We wanted these to be physical letters, and we still have big boxes of them.

I was never enamored of beautiful stationery or special pens or anything like that. This was a big commitment to write so regularly to each other, so we needed to approach this like a workhorse. The conversation was the primary thing. I would grab whatever I could to write my next letter. I sent a few cards here and there but I often wrote on legal pads. Once, Jess wrote to me in crayon on some used construction paper, because she was sitting in her car and that’s all she could find.

JESSICA: I usually wrote on legal pads, too, because I had a stack of them in my office. When I started with this, I was a development officer at Notre Dame. I served as a ghost writer for the president in thanking various people who supported Notre Dame, and I wrote those letters first on legal pads.

So, it was natural for me to write to Amy that same way. Just reach for the legal pad. We agreed that this wasn’t a precious project. We didn’t choose special paper or fountain pens. We were so focused on the letters themselves that sometimes, yes, I did write on trash I had at hand.

At one point, my daughter was very young and had trouble getting to sleep, so like a lot of parents we would use the trick of driving her around until she would fall asleep. This was particularly true at naptime. One time I did that and was just sitting in the car, letting her sleep, and I found this old piece of construction paper. I didn’t have a legal pad handy, so that’s what I used for the next letter. And, no, even though there is an old-fashioned typewriter on the cover of the book, neither of us used one.

LOVE AND SALT:
INFLUENCE OF C.S. LEWIS AND THE INKLINGS

DAVID: Any of our readers who love Christian classics, including C.S. Lewis and the Inklings, will find kindred spirits in the two of you. Your book is a treasure trove of recommendations that you make to each other about terrific literary voices—mostly Christian writers. People will close your book with a wonderful reading list in hand from the books you two share. Here’s my question: Were you surprised to find the Inklings such an inspiration? I can’t imagine a more crusty bunch of older male academics. The Inklings were an honest to goodness “old boys club.” Yet, you two love these writers.

AMY: I grew up in an agnostic/atheist family, although my whole family now is Christian of some variety. One of the very important influences in my family was when my father started reading C.S. Lewis. I was then a senior in high school and he was reading Lewis’s The Abolition of Man. Then I became philosophically interested in C.S. Lewis, too. In college, I read tons of C.S. Lewis. I was interested in him as a thinker, then became enamored of all the Inklings. There was something so beautiful in these people coming together to talk about these ideas. These were Oxford dons who also wrote novels and children’s books for real people—not for other Oxford dons. They weren’t focused on small scholarship—they were focused on big ideas. I’ve referred to our exchange of letters as our own Oxford pub.

Jessica Mesman Griffith courtesy of the publisher.

Jessica Mesman Griffith courtesy of the publisher.

JESSICA: Yes, the Inklings are huge for us. They’re like role models. We want to be in that Oxford pub, talking about God and life and death and heaven and miracles. We crave that kind of serious intellectual engagement with faith that we see in the Inklings—and we also see their deep friendships. That was very appealing to us.

DAVID: I’m curious Amy, because you teach math now at Northwestern University, whether Lewis’s very logical style appealed to you. He has been both praised and criticized for the logic he tries to lay out in his Christian apologetics.

AMY: Interesting you would ask that. When I was in college, that’s exactly what I wanted: logic. I started out as an English major and then I began to study science and math and I wanted things to be rational. So, I would say, I used to love Lewis. But now I’m much more of a Tolkien fan. One of my favorite Tolkien pieces is his essay, On Fairy Stories. He essentially says: Ultimately what is true about life comes to us in story form.

DAVID: Yes, it’s a popular piece. As he reaches the end of that essay, he argues that the Christian message is such a vast, cosmic truth that the finite human mind is incapable of grasping the entire truth. So, we receive it in the form of stories. However, Tolkien says: “This story is supreme; and it is true. Art has been verified. God is the Lord, of angels, and of men—and of elves. Legend and History have met and fused.”

JESSICA: The Inklings were a mystical bunch. I enjoy the novels of Charles Williams and, among the Inklings, Williams was really out there. Just the other day, I was re-reading a portion of his Descent into Hell. Now, I’m not saying that I totally agree with everything Williams wrote, but he has a lot of interesting ideas. One of the ideas he writes about, and we see in the other Inklings as well, is this idea of bearing each other’s burdens. They were exploring a much deeper idea here of spiritually committing to help bear each other’s burdens. This idea appeals to me, because Amy and I don’t live in the same part of the country. So, how is it possible that we can try to bear each other’s spiritual and emotional burdens?

LOVE AND SALT:
CHOOSING TO FOLLOW IN THE STEPS OF RUTH AND NAOMI

DAVID: You also draw a lot from the Bible, including the central theme that runs through the entire book: “Where you go—I will go.” That’s the timeless line that comes to us from the first chapter of the book of Ruth. I mention this because, among the millions of small groups that meet coast to coast, many of them are “Bible studies” and the participants like to touch on biblical themes. Readers certainly will find that in many forms throughout this book. I could envision a really wonderful small-group series in which people would agree to read sections of your book, each week, and then prepare to begin writing letters as they complete the series. So, let’s talk for just a moment about Ruth and Naomi. You stumbled upon this passage of the Bible at the very beginning of your friendship and it has become an important touchstone throughout your friendship.

AMY: I’m very slow to say that anything is providential. But, it’s hard not to view our discovery of Ruth and Naomi at the beginning of our friendship as anything other than providence. We were walking around New York and talking. We wanted to find something to read together, so we stepped into a bookstore and we wound up with this story.

JESSICA: It was a gift. I don’t talk that way very often, but this was a gift—in some strange way we happened upon that story in that store full of books. We were walking around Manhattan and just enjoying talking with each other. We were not setting out to read the Bible together. But we were in this bookstore in Greenwich Village and she just happened to reach onto a shelf where there was a Bible. And, we just happened to end up with Ruth and Naomi.

It was only later that we even realized that reading scripture aloud is a traditional form of praying. We were just captivated by the story of Ruth and Naomi. We liked the idea of making a vow to each other as friends. The idea of one woman committing to a friendship with another woman is a very powerful idea. Then, as we went through this friendship—and encountered tragedy together—we would remember that day in the bookstore and it gave us a noble way of thinking about our friendship.

LOVE AND SALT:
‘WHERE THE REAL STORY BEGINS’

DAVID: I have to urge readers who have enjoyed this interview—and who click over to Amazon and buy a copy—to commit to reading the first third of the book. It starts slow. Your first letters are good reading, but those opening pages aren’t what would inspire someone to call a friend and start a discussion group about this book. It’s when you reach the middle of this book that you really see the larger power of this whole story. And, no spoilers here, but I have to say:

One of the big influences on my life is my late grandmother, Mabel Yunker, a towering figure of a churchwoman in northern Indiana. She had a saying that it took me well into my 50s to understand: “Pray when you don’t need it—so when you need it, you don’t have to pray.” I’d say that’s a central truth in your book.

AMY: I’ll be interested to see what Jessica has to say about this, because she lost her mother when she was 13 and grief has been a reality for her throughout her life. But for me, grief wasn’t so real. I had an awareness of mortality, but it was theoretical for me. As we started this friendship and these letters, it was a beautiful experience for us—but it was beautiful in a poetic, abstract way. We only realized later that we were doing all of this long before we understood the depth and the power of this practice. We didn’t know how much we would need this.

JESSICA: Yes, I appreciate your saying that to readers, David, because you have to follow this story and trust that the real story will begin for you, as a reader, where it truly began for us. Think of the opening portion of the book as our training for what would come later.

DAVID: And that’s a perfect set up, Jessica, for the final question: So, what comes later for you two in 2013 and beyond?

AMY: Well, I’m 42 and, yes, we have been writing letters ever since. But there are gaps in our letters now. Having small children around the house makes it harder to produce every day. Then, there was a nine-month period where we wound up living in the same place and it didn’t make as much sense to write letters. Will there be another volume of letters? Who knows. We had no intention of creating a book in the first place. So, I could say with fear and trembling: Yes, there might be another book of letters.

JESSICA: I’m 36 and I am a writer, and this is a weird position for me as a writer to be known for my letters. We wrote these letters without any intention of turning them into a book. That came later. But, as a writer, I don’t want us to become known as just “The Letter Writing Ladies.” I’m more interested in sharing our story and letting other people take inspiration and perhaps start writing themselves. We would love it if other people were moved to take up their pens, too.

Click on the book cover above to order a copy of Love & Salt.

(Read more about the 50th anniversary of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous letter in a second story, today.)

(This interview was originally published in www.ReadTheSpirit.com, an online magazine covering religion, values and cross-cultural issues.)

Comments: (0)
Categories: Author InterviewsBibleCaregivingGreat With Groups

Lenten Journey: Past Easter, Jesus waits … with breakfast

This entry is part 8 of 8 in the series Lenten Journeys
Photo via Wikimedia Commons.

Photo via Wikimedia Commons.

By the Rev. Dr. Benjamin Pratt

Every year, as I walk the Lenten pilgrimage I am reminded of breakfasts prepared over charcoal in a remote farm community in Cuba where our United Methodist Volunteers in Mission Team was working along side our Cuban brothers and sisters to build a retreat facility for the emerging Cuban Methodist Church. It was in that setting that my hungry, empty soul was filled as if by Jesus who also prepared a breakfast over a charcoal fire for his despairing disciples. I am deeply grateful for the compassion from a community filled with Grace who fed my soul.
Gracias Senor!

In the early 1990s, Jesse Jackson personally confronted Fidel Castro with his abuse of Christians. Castro publicly apologized opening the doors for suppressed faith groups to come out of hiding and grow. By 1998, the time of my first trip, the Cuban Methodist Church had grown from 2,000 to more than30,000. Other Christian denominations and Jewish communities have grown at great speed. Within the last year, the Cuban government has asked our UMVIM teams, which have averaged one team a month, to come more often.

Perhaps the rapid growth is because their faith was a light the darkness could not overcome, an underground light much like a smoldering fire that lingers unnoticed until the firefighters have left the scene, whereupon it erupts into flames.

It is a strange irony that Genesis begins with darkness and the last of the four Gospels, John, ends in darkness—Genesis1: 1-5 and John 21: 1-14. Genesis tells us that before darkness there had never been anything other than darkness; it covered the face of the deep. At the end of the Gospel of John, the disciples go out fishing on the sea of Tiberias in the dark night! They have no luck. Their nets are empty. Then they spot somebody standing on the beach. They don’t see who it is in the darkness. It is Jesus.

All it took to break the darkness of Genesis was God’s word, “Let there be Light!” Amazing—beyond our imagination! But the darkness of John is broken by the flicker of a charcoal fire in the sand. Jesus has built a charcoal fire and he is cooking fish for his old friends. Breakfast! The sun is rising. All that we need to know about overcoming our own darkness may be found in those two scenes.

The original creation of light is so extraordinary that most of us cannot fathom it. Breakfast cooking on the beach is the opposite. It is so ordinary that we are prone to ignore it.

God’s creation of Light to overcome the darkness is not what pulls most of us to faith. It is too exceptional. So, a small spark was lit to draw us. Jesus sheltered a spark with his cupped hands and blew on it to make enough fire for a breakfast. Very few of us will come to God because of our interest in creation. We are much more likely to come because of the empty feeling in our hearts and stomachs.

Nearly every morning while working in Camp Canaan in Miller, Cuba, I was reminded of these scriptures. We awoke in the pale early morning light before the sun arose. Then, like the dawn of creation, the rising sun filled the sky with a golden ball of fire. As we watched the sunrise, the smell of breakfast being cooked over an open charcoal fire drew us toward the morning table.

I wasn’t sure why I went to Cuba. I felt called to go but it was a call I resisted. It scared me. It was out of my comfort zone. I couldn’t even speak Spanish! I responded to a pilgrimage I needed to take. I went to attempt to heal something in my hungry, empty soul. I hoped and prayed that if I loved and served in a new way my hungry, empty soul might be filled. Every morning two women cupped their hands and blew on a spark to start a charcoal fire for preparing breakfast. It was the love and compassion of colleagues in a grace filled community, eating breakfast together, working for others who loved us in return that filled the dark empty place in my soul. They loved me. I loved them. We worked in community, and Jesus brought light into the darkness of our lives and the lives of those we served. God healed my hungry, empty soul through the ones I went to serve—with charcoal, a compassionate community filled with Grace, in Cuba.

GRACIAS SENOR!

Originally posted at www.ReadTheSpirit.com, an online magazine covering religion and cultural diversity.

This column also was posted at the website for the Day1 radio network.

Comments: (3)
Categories: BibleChristianHolidaysUncategorized

Lenten Journey 7: Sacred doors into Fridays, Saturdays & Sundays

This entry is part 6 of 8 in the series Lenten Journeys

By the Rev. Dr. Benjamin Pratt

“YOU ARE HERE!”

Maps, paths and doorways collage.

Maps, paths and doorways from photos in Wikimedia Commons and from Benjamin Pratt.

We’ve all read the signs. They remind us of our current pinpoint on Earth—and, if we prayerfully reflect, we realize that these are sacred truths:
We are here.
We are among the living.
We stand on a tiny spot of God’s Creation—ready to take a step.

For Christians around the world this week, that next step carries us into the three most important days of the year. So, let’s pause in our Lenten Journey. Remember where we started? I wrote these words: “Holidays are history. That’s the way most of us approach the ancient traditions and family customs that we love to repeat each year. But, the yearlong cycle of Christian holidays are much more than that. These seasons are timeless, yet they also are very clear invitations to affirm our personal journey as God’s people.”

Remember how far we have come? You may want to review the earlier parts in this series.

Now, in Holy Week, everything we have summoned in this Lenten Journey rises and converges in a kaleidoscope of life and death, hope and tragedy, community and isolation. In these final days before Easter, we pass through enormous sorrow and abandonment as we move toward the spectacular joy we proclaim as Christians. On Good Friday, Jesus was tacked to a tree—his spirit broken. Holy Saturday is a long period of waiting when, some Christian traditions say, Jesus descended into Hell. Easter brings—resurrection.

We might think of Friday as the day of “NO!” As we experience Good Fridays, life throws us against a rock, tacks us to a tree, devastates our innocence and dreams for our marriage, our country, our children, our lives. That “NO!” breaks our spirit and almost destroys our faith in the goodness of God. On such Fridays, the pain is excruciating, and it is appropriate to be angry, enraged and in deep grief.

Saturday is “I DON’T KNOW.” We move—as Jesus’s followers did 2,000 years ago—into a soft cynicism or despair. We can’t stay in Friday’s intense pain, but we haven’t reached Easter’s joy. Saturday is the janitorial day. We can’t mourn; we can’t celebrate. So, we get up and start moving through our many tasks. Grief and anger from Friday evolves into a flat, soft, lazy, cynical bitterness, a spiritual deadness. This is life without any spice, vitality or vigor. This is spiritual accidie—a term I describe in my books on Ian Fleming and on coping with the challenges of caregiving.

And, Sunday? “YES!” We yearn for Easter, when we are reborn with new directions, new possibilities. It is the day of a clean and restored heart. We are able to sing praises and live with purpose, compassion and gratitude. The Psalmist writes: “Create in me a clean heart, O God, and put a new and right spirit within me. The sacrifice acceptable to God is a broken spirit, not a cynical spirit, not a bitter spirit. You will not reject a humble and repentant heart, O God.” (Psalm 51)

LINKS IN THIS TRIDUUM

Perhaps you can see, already, that this Lenten journey really is a cycle through which we live, over and over again, throughout our lives. The Catholic Church calls this the Easter Triduum—three inextricably linked days packed in Catholic tradition with more sacred firepower than Christmas. Bishops around the world bless all the holy oils that priests will use for 365 days until the next Triduum. The church’s mighty leaders wash the feet of the powerless, including at the central altar in the Vatican. Good Friday becomes the only day of the year without a Mass. And the liturgies for Easter? The Eastern Orthodox prayers go on for hours and hours—and hours.

In some Easter vigils, outdoor fires are lit and carried in processions. Such powerful images in these three days! My own prayers in recent years begin with images. I crave the clarity of images that reflect awe, gratitude, hospitality, compassion, fear, anxiety and hope—a vast array of feelings. These images may turn into words, some of which I record, but often I stay in the meditative clarity of the images. I often carry a camera and sometimes, I simply capture an image whole and wordless. I have given you lots of words, so let me turn to images for this most important of all periods in our journey.

PAUSE A MOMENT AT THESE THREE DOORWAYS

You may want to set aside a few minutes to read these next three paragraphs. You may want to gather up a notebook or journal to record your reflections.

A FRIDAY IMAGE: Remember the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre? Some images are burned into our collective memories: that single-file row of fleeing students and, later, the tears in President Obama’s eyes as he spoke to the nation. But, now, turn your mind’s eye toward another detail—one we all missed. As the tragedy unfolded, parents were told to report to a local fire station to pick up their children. Officials tried to bring all of the surviving students to that fire station to send them home in an orderly way. Envision a doorway—the doorway to that fire station. You are among the parents coming to take your children home. Then, you realize that all of the surviving children have been hugged and taken home. People are staring at each other, now. Weeping. Some parents are left standing. Some can no longer stand. The truth is: No more children will go home. A shocking image, isn’t it? Yet, that is what happened on Friday, December 14, 2012.

A SATURDAY IMAGE: On Saturday, January 8, 2011, U.S. Rep. Gabriel “Gabby” Giffords was shot numerous times in a Tucson shopping center. Initial news reports declared her dead, but an intern in her office, Daniel Hernandez, Jr., ministered so effectively to the severely wounded congresswoman that she was alive when she reached the hospital. During and after surgery, she was placed in a medically induced coma. She did not open her eyes for days. Imagine the doorway of her hospital room on that Saturday night: a white-wrapped body all but lifeless. It was a Saturday in which the whole nation could say only: “I don’t know.”

A SUNDAY IMAGE: Gabby Giffords has had many spectacular Easter moments over the past two years. Sunday June 22, 2011, we all saw her again—for the first time since the shooting—in two photographs she and her family released to newspapers and TV news that day. But think of another Sunday, July 31, 2011, when we all heard the news that Giffords would return to Congress the next morning! Hearts stirred in Washington and nationwide as each of us heard this news and prepared for what would unfold on that morning of Monday August 1. Focus your mind’s eye on the doorway into the U.S. House of Representatives as Giffords approached that portal. Inside, hundreds were poised to leap to their feet and applaud. In that moment at the doorway, envision the radiance of joy and purpose on her beautiful face—the resurrected image of a woman who will always live with the marks of her Friday but who lives with courage, purpose and faith in the future.

Wondering where you are this Lenten season? These three days take hold of us from that despair we all feel when we are utterly lost and scream: “No!” We have no choice but to move through those first stumbling Saturday steps—without much hope at all—admitting: “I don’t know.” And then, our faith says, we reach the “Yes!” of Easter. The Good News comes to us with that sign so clearly in our eyes again—pinpointing our sacred spot in God’s great Creation and allowing us to live again:

“YOU ARE HERE!”

May the One who called you unto life and who will call you unto death—the One who holds you Beloved and yearns that you know Eternal Life now, Bless you so that you may be an instrument of Peace, Love, Hope, Compassion and Forgiveness to all whom you encounter.
Amen.

Originally published at www.ReadTheSpirit.com, an online magazine covering religion and cultural diversity.

This column also was posted to the website for the Day1 radio network.

Comments: (1)
Categories: BibleChristianHolidaysUncategorized

Why read Peter Rollins? He preaches a survivor’s faith.

http://www.readthespirit.com/explore/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2013/03/wpid-0311_Idolatry_of_God_cover_Peter_Rollins.jpgCLICK THE COVER to visit the book’s Amazon page.THIS IS AN INTRODUCTION to Peter Rollins’ work, reported by ReadTheSpirit Editor David Crumm.
You’ll also want to read: David Crumm’s new interview with Peter Rollins.

PETER ROLLINS isn’t preaching your Mom’s Christianity. Nor is he preaching a version of the faith that you’re likely to find in most American congregations. It’s not that he denies the sacred core of Jesus’s teachings—on the contrary, he vigorously defends what he sees as the core of the Christian faith. Rather, Peter Rollins is attacking Christianity as expressed in organized religion, typical church structures and even in the creeds and liturgies used by 2 billion Christians today. He brings many of his central ideas together in his newest book: The Idolatry of God: Breaking Our Addiction to Certainty and Satisfaction.

USING THE “I” WORD: Like an Old Testament prophet railing against the prevailing powers, Rollins calls the existing structures of Christianity: idols. He argues these idols have been set up to fulfill the wishes of needy churchgoers. Peter compares the goals of most contemporary Christian preachers to parents telling their children stories about Santa Claus. In some cases, Peter uses even nastier metaphors to describe the selling of Christianity as wish fulfillment—see our interview with Peter for more on that.

REACHING FOR THE CLOROX: Among the many prophetic teachers trying to scrub down Christianity today—including Brian McLaren,  Anne Lamott, Marcus Borg, Barbara Brown Taylor and Richard Rohr—Peter Rollins is the equivalent of reaching for a jug of Clorox bleach. Others hope to cleanse and polish. Rollins wants to start by wiping away the whole structure of what passes for organized religion.

4 Reasons to Read Peter Rollins

Why would anyone read a book by such a radical prophet? (Peter proudly calls himself a “radical” and fully recognizes the extreme nature of his message.)

Peter Rollins Prepares Us for Times When All Else Crumbles

Peter takes what other reformers are preaching in a softer form, then pushes those ideas to their logical conclusion. Want to see how Christianity might survive and thrive even in a post-apocalyptic world in which our major social and political institutions crumble? Peter is writing that theology today. He is not inviting global catastrophe, but he is writing about how people of faith can keep living and working and finding satisfaction—no matter what tragedies and doubts assail us. One of his models is Mother Teresa, who confessed her own sense of God’s silence—even as she continued her work among the poor.

From Peter Rollins’ 2011 Insurrection, in a passage about Mother Teresa: Her strength is not staggering because she was able to banish all her doubts, but rather because she was able to acknowledge them without entering into some nihilistic prison. In her utter devotion to bringing life, protecting life, and enriching life, she utterly lost herself. And in losing herself she found joy, peace, happiness and life.

Peter Rollins Calls the Truly Alienated Home

Peter speaks to many who are completely alienated from faith. For example, ReadTheSpirit has long recommended the work of Jay Bakker, the radical American preacher who is the son of disgraced televangelists. When you read about—or watch TV documentaries about—small groups of Christians gathering in a Jay Bakker style of congregation, then you’re glimpsing what Peter Rollins is teaching. Peter isn’t preaching a church-growth message about luring seekers into worship. Peter is writing about embracing truly wounded men and women who are offended by church.

From Peter Rollins’ new The Idolatry of God: My primary inspiration for writing the book came as a direct result of sharing the ideas with some people who would not describe themselves as theistic or religious. They had not known that there was such a thing as a faith that genuinely embraced unknowing, celebrated difference and encouraged a direct embrace of life.

Peter Rollins Welcomes Downsizing

Rollins is not alone in preaching the spiritual wisdom of downsizing. Shane Claiborne and Jonathan Wilson Hartgrove coordinate a nationwide network of small Christian communities that see their grassroots communities as the future of the faith in troubled times. Rollins is writing about how to begin connecting circles of spiritually seeking men and women even before these full-fledged communities form.

From Peter Rollins’ new The Idolatry of God: I am arguing for collectives … where the liturgical structure does not treat God as a product that would make us whole but as the mystery that enables us to live abundantly in the midst of life’s difficulties.

Peter Rollins Preaches a Survivor’s Faith

http://www.readthespirit.com/explore/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2013/03/wpid-0311_Peter_Rollins_Insurrection_cover.jpgCLICK THE COVER to visit the Amazon page.Contemporary Christianity works well for millions of Americans because America is a successful nation. One reason that Buddhism meshes well with impoverished Asian cultures is that Buddhism’s central teachings urge people to quit striving after human desires and focus, instead, on right living that compassionately helps others and awakens a deeper appreciation of the world as we find it. Buddhism begins by taking into account that life will involve a great deal of suffering—something most American preachers are hesitant to proclaim. Rollins starts with that deep spiritual truth and preaches a Christian hope that, even in the midst of suffering, we can appreciate each other, we can express our compassion and we can appreciate the sacred wonders of the world around us. This survivor’s faith welcomes doubt. This survivor’s faith frees us from striving after typical symbols of success. This is a Christian message that finds hope and a way forward, even as tragedies befall us.

From Peter Rollins’ 2011 Insurrection: To Believe Is Human To Doubt, Divine: Traditional Western fairy tales, as mythological expressions of our values, are often concerned with poor people becoming wealthy, powerless people becoming powerful, or single people finding a suitable marriage partner. This is very different from cultures that have stories of the rich renouncing their wealth, the powerful becoming weak, and lovers letting their beloved go. … Just as this is true of a society’s fairy tales, so it is true of our personal ideals, political dreams and religious imaginings. Our ideas of what a fulfilled life would look like, how a just society would operate, or how an authentic faith could be expressed are all too often uncritically reflective of the dominant underlying political and theological ideas that we imbibed as infants. The truly revolutionary move, then, does not lie in attempting to fulfill our dreams but in putting ourselves into a situation in which we are able to dream new ones.

PRAISE FOR PETER ROLLINS

Depending on who you already are following for edgy writing about the future of Christianity, most of those authors also read Peter Rollins’ books …

Brian McLaren on How (Not) to Speak of God (2006): “Reading this book did good for my mind and for my soul. … In fact, I would say this is one of the two or three most rewarding books on theology I have read in ten years.”

Rob Bell on Insurrection: To Believe Is Human To Doubt, Divine (2011): “Pete takes you to the edge of a cliff. And just when most writers would pull you back, he pushes you off. But after your initial panic, you realize that your fall is a form of flying. And it’s thrilling.”

Tony Jones on the newest, The Idolatry of God: Breaking Our Addiction to Certainty and Satisfaction: “Let the reader, the Christian, the skeptic beware, for with The Idolatry of God, Peter Rollins has taken his theological programme of turning everything we believe upside down to the next level. Not content to simply subvert how we believe, Rollins now turns his attention to what we believe.”

You’ll also want to read: David Crumm’s new interview with Peter Rollins this week.

Originally published at www.ReadTheSpirit.com, an online magazine covering religion and cultural diversity.

Comments: (0)
Categories: Author InterviewsBibleCaregivingGreat With GroupsPeacemaking

The Peter Rollins Interview: Christian from a distant shore

http://www.readthespirit.com/explore/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2013/03/wpid-0311_Peter_Rollins_photo_for_interview.jpgPETER ROLLINS. Photo by Gavin Millar used by permission.IN THIS INTERVIEW, ReadTheSpirit Editor David Crumm speaks with Peter Rollins, Belfast-born Irish writer, teacher, philosopher and theologian.
You’ll also want to read: Our Introduction to Peter Rollins’ work and recent books.

DAVID: How do you describe your religious affiliation?

PETER: I would definitely describe myself as Christian, but obviously in a different way than a lot of other people call themselves Christian.

If I had to give a three-minute introduction to the core of my work, I would say basically: My argument is that we’re all seeking certainty and satisfaction in our lives. We want something that makes us feel whole and that makes us feel right—and that assures us that the people on the other side of the river are wrong. We’re looking for certainty and satisfaction in a lot of questions we face in daily life: What car should we drive? Who should we marry? What beliefs are going to make us happiest? My argument is that the world has become like a huge vending machine and everybody’s trying to sell their products to satisfy these questions. The church has come along and has placed yet another product in a slot in the vending machine next to all the others. That big vending machine is really an idol. I’m arguing that religion isn’t in the business of holding up the sacred to be grasped like a product that pops out of a machine. Religion helps us see the depth and beauty of creation, even in our brokenness.

I often speak about faith in ways that sound like a psychoanalyst. I’m less interested in getting people to think a certain way. I’m much more interested in getting them to ask questions about why they believe things—and to explore how these beliefs function in their lives. Are their beliefs helping them to function as better human beings? Or are these beliefs actually crutches that prop them up in negative ways?

DAVID: In your newest book—The Idolatry of God: Breaking Our Addiction to Certainty and Satisfaction—you write repeatedly about the many ways “we are caught up in a relentless pursuit of certainty and satisfaction,” which was not Jesus’s original message nor was it the example of Jesus’s life. That’s the backbone of your argument. Now, it’s easy to see this critique targeting the prosperity preaching of a Joel Osteen or even the feel-good preaching in mega churches like Rick Warren’s place. But you’re actually talking about virtually all of organized Christianity, right?

PETER: It’s easy to attack the Joel Osteens and Rick Warrens. My argument is deeper than that. A prosperity gospel also is preached in Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox churches. We experience this in the liturgies and the preaching. I’m arguing from a radical perspective that we need to break free from this. We need to open honest new ways to look at our own brokenness—and to welcome others into new collectives.

DAVID: This point is central to your new book—particularly this invitation to honestly welcoming “the other” to be a part of this new kind of relationship or community or collective that we might form. You’re not only talking about giving up our promises that faith will make us successful. You’re also talking about lowering our defenses and inviting people into our community who are quite different than we are. You write: “It is in this genuine encounter with the other that our own unseen issues begin to break down. In the other, we are brought to the place where we must question whether we can begin to see the shadow side of our beliefs.”

PETER: Absolutely.

PETER ROLLINS ON THE FAILINGS OF CURRENT INTERFAITH DIALOGUE

http://www.readthespirit.com/explore/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2013/03/wpid-0311_med_idolatry_of_god_cover_peter_rollins.jpgCLICK THE COVER to visit the book’s Amazon page.DAVID: So, you spend a lot of time in the book explaining why you think most current approaches to interfaith or cross-cultural dialogue are bankrupt. You’re calling for something much more humbling in the way we approach other faiths, other cultures, other ways of living.

PETER: When we encounter someone who is different than ourselves, we generally have one of four responses. First, we find differences, but then we try to make these others like us. We try to fit what they are thinking into the way we think. We assume that we are right so we find a way to consume them.

DAVID: As you describe the process in your book—for the Star Trek fans reading this interview—you say that this first kind of dialogue is similar to the way the Borg try to force other cultures across the universe to become a part of their collective.

PETER: So, that’s the first kind of response. Then, if consuming the others doesn’t work, we may try to vomit them back out. We decide that they are just too bizarre, that they are not at all like us. So, we wind up making them an enemy, rather than trying to make them just like us. Or, third, we may tolerate them and, in the West, that mainly means we agree to let them practice whatever they want behind their closed doors—as long as they don’t expect to do it in the public square. So, in all three of those responses, we really are assuming that we are right and they are wrong. We just respond in different ways to their being wrong. Then, there is a fourth way in which a lot of people engage in interfaith dialogue today—by assuming that, underneath our different ways of expressing things, we’re all the same in some simplistic way. The first three ways assume that I’m right and you’re wrong. This fourth way assumes we’re all right.

But here is the problem: In all of those approaches to the other, we assume we’re right. We approach the others from a higher position. We are looking down on them, assuming that our own tradition is right. What I am calling for is something quite different: Placing ourselves beneath the other and listening in a different way. Normally, we miss most of what the other person is actually saying because we are mainly trying to fit what they are saying into our own value system and beliefs.

DAVID: Right here, for any readers who are puzzling over this point you’re making, I’ll urge that they think of Stephen Prothero’s book, God Is Not One, where he argues a similar line about the flaws in some approaches to cross-cultural and interfaith dialogue.

PETER ROLLINS ON NEW DISCIPLINES FOR CROSS-CULTURAL LISTENING

DAVID: But let’s take this a step further. In your book, you also give some very important advice concerning listening. I think this portion of your new book is one of the most valuable teachings you offer. You call your approach “literalistic listening” in the book. I’ve also heard this process called “critical listening” or even “neutral listening.” Over the years, I’ve taught seminars for journalists about reporting on religion, and I teach that they should conduct either a very long interview—or even more than one interview—to achieve real clarity with the person they are trying to interview. It’s far too easy to misunderstand people by filtering their language about faith through our own anticipated categories.

PETER: Yes, you’re describing that well. If we leave our interactions with the other in the first four categories we’ve just discussed—we always walk away assuming that we are right about everything. We use religion to protect us from others—not to challenge our own beliefs and assumptions. It’s only when we are honestly approaching the other from a position beneath, not looking down on the other, that we have a chance to realize that perhaps some things we believe or practice actually are pretty weird or even monstrous to the other person. This leads to the possibility of realizing that we may have a shadow side to others.

DAVID: As a journalist, I agree with you and commend this portion of your book to readers. But, I have to say: As someone who is popular among evangelical Christians, this is a pretty remarkable thing to find in the heart of your book. Most evangelicals I’ve encountered in interfaith dialogue are assuming that dialogue is worth undertaking because it may lead others to Christ. You’re saying something radically different: Good, honest, humble dialogue is likely to change us as well as the world.

Then, you take this idea back inside the church. If we are not humbly and honestly and carefully talking with and listening to the other—it’s because we’re not even honestly and clearly talking with each other inside the church. By and large, you argue, most church leaders—preachers and teachers in congregations—are trying to hand out the weekly dose of a satisfying God drug. They want people to feel better. You actually use that metaphor at one point in the book—the feel-good preacher as drug dealer.

PETER ROLLINS ON CLERGY ‘CAUGHT IN A TRAP’

PETER: My concern for clergy is that they’re caught in a trap like the Emperor’s new clothes. Behind closed doors, clergy doubt much of what they believe. Is God there? Is the Bible accurate? We all have doubts. But, when most clergy step up into the pulpit, none of that is expressed. The truth is that most people who come to church have lots of doubts themselves, but they cannot express their doubts, either, because the church has become this place where everyone is expected to be a stalwart of Christianity. The congregation finds itself caught in this game in which everyone is trying to hide from each other. The church can become like this crack house, where everyone wanders in to escape their suffering for an hour with their weekly hit from the church.

I’m not blaming people. I admit that I do this myself. It’s so tempting. But my argument is that we need our preachers and teachers to come out and say: “I am broken and full of doubt.” At first, people may be terrified, if they’ve never heard such honesty before. But the moment we say that from the pulpit, that allows those of us sitting in the pews to surface our own doubts and brokenness.

DAVID: And, as you argue in the conclusion of your book, it’s in that honest sharing that we truly become the church at its best—or, you like to use the word collectives. So, let me ask: Should we assume that these new collectives will be small? Jay Bakker’s radical Christian gatherings are small. Shane Claiborne and Jonathan Wilson Hartgrove preach the value of downsizing. Is small better?

PETER ROLLINS ON IS SMALL BETTER?

PETER: I don’t think our communities necessarily need to be small. Musicians have shown us that we can connect large numbers of people with this message of sharing our brokenness and humanity. Think of Bob Dylan, Van Morrison or Tom Waits. They come along and draw huge audiences together. So, I’m not saying that communities can’t grow. But most of the Christian collectives I’ve seen are small—35, 50 or 100 people. One reason is that these new kinds of collectives are trying to help people experience the beauty and sacred nature of all life—the purpose is not to grow the structure itself. So, people feel free to continually come and go over time.

DAVID: The message that runs through your books is strong stuff. Do you expect that it will catch on with lots of readers?

PETER: I’m not trying to convince everyone that they should embrace all of my ideas. I’m just saying: Let’s at least try to be honest with each other. Let’s start there. If we are willing to admit that we’re broken and we have doubts already, right now, then this new honesty will help a lot of people to find real freedom.

For me, this is a constant in every generation. I’m not trying to crush people. I’m trying to help people see the wisdom of honesty. I hope people will see that Christianity is an invitation. I don’t go out and tell people that it’s an invitation to life after death. I find that question boring, because I don’t think it’s the fundamental question we face. The fundamental question is not life after death, it’s this: Is life possible before we die? Can we truly live before we die. And, I’m hopeful that we can.

YOU’LL ALSO WANT TO READ: Our Introduction to Peter Rollins’ work and books.

Originally published at www.ReadTheSpirit.com, an online magazine covering religion and cultural diversity.

Comments: (0)
Categories: Author InterviewsBibleGreat With GroupsPeacemaking

Everybody’s buzzing ’bout The Bible (As Seen on TV)

http://www.readthespirit.com/explore/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2013/03/wpid-0302_Jesus_in_the_History_Channel_The_Bible_series.jpg

THE BIBLE—As Seen on TV. Those six words capture what faith-and-film writer Edward McNulty describes as a “spectacular new series”—great for individual viewing and small-group discussion—if we watch with a bit of skepticism.

UPDATE FOR MONDAY APRIL 1, 2013: Don’t miss McNulty’s fourth column on The Bible series—just in time to catch the fourth part of the series on the Lifetime network tonight. Today, McNulty writes: “I can say that this series has really hit its stride.”

The Final Week: The New Testament portions are “far superior” to earlier episodes.

For Week 4: Highlights of the TV epic now focusing on the life of Jesus.
For Week 3:
Here is McNulty’s analysis of Week 3 in the History Channel epic.
For Week 2:
Here is McNulty’s analysis of Week 2 in the series.
For Part 1:
Continue reading—this article (below) is McNulty’s series overview and look at Part 1.

McNulty and ReadTheSpirit are not alone in reporting on this phenomenon. The Bible is truly—”show biz.” Executive Producer Mark Burnett is the man behind Survivor, The Voice and Celebrity Apprentice. Best-selling pastor Rick Warren is publicly promoting the series. The New York Times’ Neil Genzlinger, like McNulty, gives the series a mixed review. More important than Genzlinger’s text was the buzz behind it: The Times splashed full-color coverage across the front page of its Arts section.

Here is Edward McNulty’s original overview and invitation to our readers …

‘The Bible’ As Seen on TV:
Spectacle, Skepticism and
A Great Opportunity for Congregations

By Edward McNulty

http://www.readthespirit.com/explore/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2013/03/wpid-0302_Moses_in_History_Channel_The_Bible_series_Joe_Alblas.jpgPHOTOS FROM ‘THE BIBLE’: Top shows Jesus walking on water from an unusual perspective. Here is Moses during the Exodus period of the story. Below is Samson and his mother. Photos by Joe Alblas, released for public use with the series.AN AMBITIOUS and spectacular new series, The Bible, begins on the History Channel this Sunday, March 3. The 10-hour series covers highlights of the Old and New Testaments, beginning with stories from Genesis (Abraham is prominent here), the saga of King David, the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, and the beginning of the work of the apostle Paul’s ministry.

My review today is based on seeing portions, but not all, of the series. My advice to viewers is this: There is much to admire—but you will want to take some parts of this drama with a grain of salt.

Today, I invite you to bookmark this article and come back periodically to add your comments. I’d like to know what you think and I’m sure many other readers will welcome your thoughts. I will update my own thoughts and questions as we go through the series. This is a great time to invite friends to view with you.

WHERE AND WHEN TO SEE THE BIBLE:
SUNDAYS on HISTORY: Each episode debuts in prime time on Sunday nights, but “History” repeats itself, so this series is easy to watch or record.
MONDAYS on LIFETIME: Both the History Channel and Lifetime are owned by A&E Networks—so each episode also will air Monday nights in prime time on Lifetime.
DVD SET: The Bible series has not yet been released on DVD, but is available for pre-order.

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BIBLE SERIES TO WATCH FOR:

SACRIFICE OF ABRAHAM: This sequence is very well done and brings out the drama of the father’s agony over carrying out what he perceives to be the will of God—as well as the boy’s puzzlement and fear over what his father is doing. Added to this is the cutaway to mother Sarah, becoming aware of her husband’s intention and rushing frantically up the mountain to stop the terrible proceedings. Viewers are likely to gain a deeper appreciation of the humanity of the biblical characters.

This portion of the series is a great discussion-starter with friends: What do you think about this epic story that is a sacred junction point in Jewish, Christian and Muslim traditions? What does your particular tradition say about Abraham? (Versions of this story can be quite different, even within a single faith.) Today, tell us what you think in a comment, below.

THE SAGA OF MOSES: The other major story in the first week’s two-hour presentation is that of Moses. I appreciate the special effects in this sequence, although some viewers may wonder why the voice from the bush doesn’t tell Moses to take off his shoes. That’s what I mean about skepticism. This is a made-for-TV version of the Bible, not the Bible itself. I also like the flashback sequences we see from Egypt, where the young Moses kills a man.

Like Abraham, Moses is a patriarch spanning all three Abrahamic faiths. If you have a chance to discuss this series with a diverse circle of friends, Moses is another good choice for starting the conversation. You may be surprised by the perspectives you will hear on this figure you thought you knew so well.

http://www.readthespirit.com/explore/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2013/03/wpid-0302_Samson_and_his_mother_The_History_Channel_The_Bible_series_credit_Joe_Alblas.jpgWEEK 2—SAMSON and DAVID & GOLIATH: Adventure lovers will appreciate the stories of Samson and David and Goliath. Especially intriguing is the choice of black actors in portraying Sampson and his mother. Once again, remember my advice: Enjoy the series but take some details with a grain of salt. For example, on his way to meet the huge Philistine champion, David recites Psalm 23. Not historically accurate—but certainly a nice dramatic touch.

WEEKS 3, 4 and 5—LIFE OF JESUS: This History Channel series lines up nicely with the current Western and the later Eastern Lenten seasons this year. The stories of Jesus coincide with the conclusion of Western Lent. Eastern Christians will have just started their Great Lent. So, from East to West, this series becomes a welcome opportunity for congregations.

While some characters, such as Samson, are cast in innovative ways for this production—the actor playing Jesus is the usual Euro-American actor. Obviously, Jesus was Jewish and of Middle Eastern descent. The actor playing Jesus this time is Diogo Morgado, born in Portugal and currently a very popular TV star across Spain, Portugal and Brazil. Nevertheless, Morgado gives us a dramatically satisfying portrayal of a strong leader. One interesting touch in the Jesus episodes is the inclusion of Mary Magdalene with Jesus’s followers in the boat during the walking-on-water scene. That is historically justifiable, since women were a close part of Jesus’s inner circle, and it may please many TV viewers to see her in such a prominent role.

WANT MORE STUDY AND DISCUSSION RESOURCES?

The series website is packed with helpful features. Look for the Questions to Reflect Upon and other materials. Clearly, producers Mark Burnett and his wife Roma Downey are hoping millions of us will discuss these stories. It is good to see the History Channel getting back to its original purpose—the entertaining presentation of history.

Where to find more from Edward McNulty …

Comments: (0)
Categories: BibleGreat With GroupsJewishMovies and TVMuslim